It's been a while, but the construction of our new house is just about to start. This is what happens when an architect designs his own home:
1) It takes a few years, innumerable drafts, what-ifs and alternate versions before any kind of coherent design emerges. Let us call this design Plan A.
2) Planning permission is sought and obtained for that design. Note that the process of preparing that planning application occasioned many detours and refinements to the design. That this work is non-chargeable appears to have little effect in restraining employee-hours allocated to this process.
3) It is decided to change something about the appearance. This requires a new planning application.
4) Working drawings are prepared, a similar process to that to which point 2) refers.
5) Tenders are sought from building contractors. All tenders exceed ridiculously optimistic under-estimate budget. It is decided to examine where savings might obtain.
6) This process leads to a re-evaluation of Plan A and the emergence of a completely different design. Let us call it Plan B. Plan B's explicit purpose is to provide a slightly smaller house which should prove less expensive than Plan A.
7) Hey! if Plan B is cheaper, maybe we can have a basement.
8) See point 2)
9) See point 4)
10) Tenders for Plan B exceed those received for Plan A by a considerable degree, despite a reduction in floor area.
11) Hey! Maybe we will be able to see the sea from the roof terrace in Plan A.
12) Those who tendered for Plan A the first time around are either not in a position to stand over their tenders or not available. Tenders are sought (again) for Plan A.
13) A building contractor is appointed, foundations to be poured on Monday 10 May.
It is said that a lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client. An architect who designs his own house has a dream client and a nightmare client wrapped up in one package and further, one who stiffs him on the fee!
Recent Comments